|
|
UltimateEuropeForums.netWelcome to the Official Ultimate Europe Forum. |
|
Author |
Message |
Athletic Bilbao 122
|
Posted: Mon May 15, 2017 8:50 pm |
|
Joined: Fri Dec 16, 2016 11:58 am Posts: 807
|
ronem wrote: But you are asking for immunity from permanent loss of stats for your players. Surely we all accept that injury is part of the game and therefore that there is a possibility that an injury might cause such a drop? I have long lamented the dumbing down of the game. There is always a call for more rises, less injuries, more scouted stars, more tip-offs. So UE have supplied plenty of extras. You can add RES to help prevent injury; you can boost speed; add GEN to avoid suspension but it still isn't enough because it costs and we should get it for free! They tell us the max values so that big boys don't spoil our fun but sadly others still get in the way and win the tombola. Perhaps the time is ripe for different levels of games so that a manager can compete at a echelon at which he can get the challenge that he can cope with. Completely agree with this. For me it's now a case of less is more. I'd like to see custom made games, provided there's enough interest. I'd like to go back to basics when I first started ue back in 2006. But each to there own!
_________________ Athletic Bilbao 122 Deportivo Alaves 123 Alianza Atletico 124
Discord- Dillinja84#8741 WhatsApp 07484 131951
|
|
|
|
|
Athletic Bilbao 122
|
Posted: Mon May 15, 2017 8:52 pm |
|
Joined: Fri Dec 16, 2016 11:58 am Posts: 807
|
mick3649 wrote: What does this mean Mark "echelon" You have Google at your finger tips, Mick. Don't be lazy mate haha
_________________ Athletic Bilbao 122 Deportivo Alaves 123 Alianza Atletico 124
Discord- Dillinja84#8741 WhatsApp 07484 131951
|
|
|
|
|
mick3649
|
Posted: Mon May 15, 2017 8:54 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2012 4:12 pm Posts: 2448 Location: Newcastle
|
ronem wrote: I didn't want to use 'level' twice in the same sentence, Mick. Thank you for clearing that up
_________________ Lazio 54 , West Ham 108 , Mainz 111 , Barcelona 112 HFG , Celta Vigo 115 , Watford 116 , Leicester City 117 HFG , Barcelona 118 , B Dortmund119 Legends , Newcastle Utd 120 , Spartak Moscow 121 HFG, FF Jaro
|
|
|
|
|
mick3649
|
Posted: Mon May 15, 2017 8:54 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2012 4:12 pm Posts: 2448 Location: Newcastle
|
Kazan118 Schalke119 wrote: mick3649 wrote: What does this mean Mark "echelon" You have Google at your finger tips, Mick. Don't be lazy mate haha Rather read it from Mr Rone then Mr Google
_________________ Lazio 54 , West Ham 108 , Mainz 111 , Barcelona 112 HFG , Celta Vigo 115 , Watford 116 , Leicester City 117 HFG , Barcelona 118 , B Dortmund119 Legends , Newcastle Utd 120 , Spartak Moscow 121 HFG, FF Jaro
|
|
|
|
|
Dan_139
|
Posted: Mon May 15, 2017 9:21 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2012 1:08 pm Posts: 667
|
Like this, great idea. Rather than Karma Points, could you not just incorporate it into UE points? Just may be easier to keep it all under one banner? Just dumb down the amount of points you get, or redo the amount of UE points it costs to do things?
_________________ Strasbourg & Breidablik Game 122 Atalanta Game 123 Penarol Game 124
|
|
|
|
|
Lee G
|
Posted: Mon May 15, 2017 9:45 pm |
|
|
I think I prefer it if we kept UE points and Karma points separate. I suppose if you put it in simple terms it comes down to the more work you put in the game and forum the more your rewarded. I'm pretty surprised how so many more don't think this is a good thing.
With that in mind I like the idea of different types of games for different level of manager, the level determined by the amount each manager wants to partake mixed with the detailing of the game. So for example 'game a' couple be points, 10 sides scout weekly, with all the extra's to help with 'game b' moderately challenging and then 'game c' with no points, karma points, perhaps less sides to scout and a few Moreno less privileges. This way I feel would combat managers leaving a team they have taken after a few turns as they will opt to join a game of their preference and suitability.
|
|
|
|
|
Dan_139
|
Posted: Mon May 15, 2017 10:26 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2012 1:08 pm Posts: 667
|
Inter & Norrkoping wrote: I think I prefer it if we kept UE points and Karma points separate. I suppose if you put it in simple terms it comes down to the more work you put in the game and forum the more your rewarded. I'm pretty surprised how so many more don't think this is a good thing.
With that in mind I like the idea of different types of games for different level of manager, the level determined by the amount each manager wants to partake mixed with the detailing of the game. So for example 'game a' couple be points, 10 sides scout weekly, with all the extra's to help with 'game b' moderately challenging and then 'game c' with no points, karma points, perhaps less sides to scout and a few Moreno less privileges. This way I feel would combat managers leaving a team they have taken after a few turns as they will opt to join a game of their preference and suitability. I mean as in have the same karma points reward, but just have all the rewards under the ue points banner? Just easier to keep track of and probably easier for Ue to implement? I think all the privileges for forum participation are great, having come back to the game from a 3 year absence, the quietness of the forum I find difficult to adjust to!
_________________ Strasbourg & Breidablik Game 122 Atalanta Game 123 Penarol Game 124
|
|
|
|
|
Math
|
Posted: Mon May 15, 2017 11:27 pm |
|
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2015 6:26 pm Posts: 2619
|
Padova 119 wrote: Inter & Norrkoping wrote: I think I prefer it if we kept UE points and Karma points separate. I suppose if you put it in simple terms it comes down to the more work you put in the game and forum the more your rewarded. I'm pretty surprised how so many more don't think this is a good thing.
With that in mind I like the idea of different types of games for different level of manager, the level determined by the amount each manager wants to partake mixed with the detailing of the game. So for example 'game a' couple be points, 10 sides scout weekly, with all the extra's to help with 'game b' moderately challenging and then 'game c' with no points, karma points, perhaps less sides to scout and a few Moreno less privileges. This way I feel would combat managers leaving a team they have taken after a few turns as they will opt to join a game of their preference and suitability. I mean as in have the same karma points reward, but just have all the rewards under the ue points banner? Just easier to keep track of and probably easier for Ue to implement? I think all the privileges for forum participation are great, having come back to the game from a 3 year absence, the quietness of the forum I find difficult to adjust to! Yeah I'm with you on that, 117 is nearly great yet it's a hard format game with an exceptionally high amount of managers still in it. No one can be bothered to partake in anything on the forum. I guess with the karma points you will see whose active and put the effort in in oppose to the ones who don't. Also I think I would use karma points as a guideline for manager trustworthy as well, prioristing higher karma for deals etc.
_________________ Active Teams
Game 123 (EFG) - Bayern Munich Game 123 (EFG) - Notts County Game 124 (HFG) - Al Nassr
|
|
|
|
|
Lee G
|
Posted: Mon May 15, 2017 11:33 pm |
|
|
If it helps games and forum become more proactive then I'm game.
|
|
|
|
|
mick3649
|
Posted: Mon May 15, 2017 11:35 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2012 4:12 pm Posts: 2448 Location: Newcastle
|
117 still going strong just Deals isn't the same and some do it for the sake of it which is a shame think most of the teams they are happy with so never know could pick up again
_________________ Lazio 54 , West Ham 108 , Mainz 111 , Barcelona 112 HFG , Celta Vigo 115 , Watford 116 , Leicester City 117 HFG , Barcelona 118 , B Dortmund119 Legends , Newcastle Utd 120 , Spartak Moscow 121 HFG, FF Jaro
|
|
|
|
|
Fadi
|
Posted: Mon May 15, 2017 11:45 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 4:04 pm Posts: 667 Location: London, UK
|
Hi Ben, All my thoughts on your post are in red below... Please do let me know your feedback. Admin wrote: Karma points will be similar to UE points, but gained by being active in the game and forum. Karma can be gained by: 1) Submitting an MDS (5 Karma) - Whilst i know people forget to submit their MDS why are we rewarding someone for doing something so vital in playing the game? - I think this should be 1 point!2) Completing an agreed deal with another manager (1 per player transferred) (Not by selling a player via the transfer list or two a rest of the World club) - No indication here of how many points you are offering so i would say 20, this is 100% a good one to keep on here and im sure gibbo will agree3) Using the ‘Charity Work’ action in the actions section (1 per action slot used) - This again is a good idea, however i would like to see morale interrogated with this also, especially players with "DIS" sa having it go down cause they hated it or up because the played a trick on the players whilst away from training - I would also like to see feedback from your assistant in detail of how it went and who enjoyed it and who didn't. - Again no points indicated so i would say 10.4) Posted a message on the manager noticeboard (unique/relevant messages only) - Whilst this is a good way to get people on the forums, how is this going to be monitored? 5) Whichever manager spends the most (or joint most) actions on 'Charity Work' gets an additional 25 Karma points. - I dont agree with this, so if you fill your actions section with charity every week and dont train no one or praise no one etc you get rewarded? Hmmm 6) The running and completing, or winning, of any player run competitions on the forum will game you Karma. The amount will depend on the competition, email the office if you wish to do this. - This i 100% agree with and i would offer 100 points for running a SUCCESSFUL competition and offered at the end of the competition. 7) You can use an Action slot to bet 10 Karma on the result of a league match. The odds will be (league position*2+ 8)/20. So betting on a first place team to win would win you 5 points. Betting on a 6th placed team would win you 10 points. Betting on a 14th placed team would win you 18 points. This can be done multiple teams per week and you can bet on yourself. Any team caught picking a weakened team for a meaningful match or betting on another manager doing so, will lose Karma. Ok this is where it gets complicated, #1 You shouldn't be able to bet on yourself, #2 the penalty for anyone going against the (fielding a weakened team etc) should be serve eg 200 lost karma (even if that puts you in minus).Karma can be lost by: If a deal is arranged on a thread on the forum, and both managers write 'confirmed' on the thread, it is classed as 'agreed'. - Whilst this is a good idea, this can open a can of worms on the naming and shaming type thread that you do not agree or allow in UE.If one manager pulls out of the deal - the manager who has been let down can report it to the office by email, if they wish to. The manager who pulled out of the deal would lose 20 karma points. If a manager fails to write a deal down or does so wrongly they will have the opportunity to do the deal in the following turn. - What happens if its attention to detail, eg the ID had 1 wrong letter cause they typed "D" instead of "F" as they are next to each other on the keyboard?Deals arranged by pm or whatsapp are unaffected, unless they are confirmed on the forum. - This can be a way to avoid receiving a penalty, or if the said manager wanted to penalise the other manager for failing the deal a name and shame situation could arise from this... Karma can be spent on: 1) Reducing an injury by 1 week (20 Karma) (only be done once per team, per week, can't be done for 1 week injuries). - Good idea2) Regaining lost confidence (50 Karma) (can only be done one the week that a player’s confidence has gone down) - Good idea3) Persuade a player not to retire (100 Karma) (can only be done on players under 37) - Good idea, however i dont think it should always work, maybe set the percentage to 93.33% - Meaning that 9 times out of 10 it will work, however that 1 time it might or it might not work - Also maybe you should be told on week 20 that so and so is going to retire eos allowing you to decide early on using the karma points or not, otherwise you may use longevity and the player retires.4) Give an older player longevity (200 Karma) (less likely to lose stats at the EOS) - Whats the age limit? As above5) Give a player the Def/Mid/Att special ability (500 Karma) - Good ideaWhen this is implemented, all Karma spend and UE Points spent, will be done in the actions section.
_________________ Fadi Mazloum Botafogo G124 NEW PODCAST WEBSITE COMING SOON 07787560603 ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ ------------------- Real Madrid Game 43 - Champions League Winners - S2 Inter Milan Game 105 - Treble Winner S3 Santa Clara Game 108 - Doubles Winner S2
|
|
|
|
|
Math
|
Posted: Tue May 16, 2017 9:01 am |
|
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2015 6:26 pm Posts: 2619
|
Disagree with it causing the name and shaming thing as no ones name will be mentioned on forum, they will just lose karma and no one will know other than them. To be honest everyone knows when someone has been let down as gossip spreads like wildfire in UE. Also the posts would be easy to monitor by admin by noting down everyone's total now and then checked each week to see how many more they have posted. So all easy work mate.
What I would suggest is maybe delete unused accounts, there are a load of them.
_________________ Active Teams
Game 123 (EFG) - Bayern Munich Game 123 (EFG) - Notts County Game 124 (HFG) - Al Nassr
|
|
|
|
|
Tilly
|
Posted: Tue May 16, 2017 9:37 am |
|
Joined: Tue Oct 28, 2014 1:12 am Posts: 166
|
This is a decent proposal as the rewards for spending the Karma points don't provide any game breaking or overpowered rewards. I like the idea of slowly being able to reduce a players time out with injury, especially as the game engine has injured Koke for a total of 28 turns in 2 seasons (game 118) My only concern would be the amount of additional work this causes for Ben as others have mentioned, if he is comfortable with it then all good. Only one question really; Let's say a manager didn't pull out of a deal, but instead lets say he entered the player code incorrectly causing the "confirmed" transfer to fail...would said manager lose Karma for that? Would people use things like this as a loophole?
_________________ First Wolfenstein Legend QuakeCon Finalist, Dallas 2003, 2004 Sponsored by PC World
|
|
|
|
|
Dinamo Tbilisi
|
Posted: Tue May 16, 2017 10:44 am |
|
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 10:07 pm Posts: 1527 Location: Hereford
|
Tilly wrote: Only one question really; Let's say a manager didn't pull out of a deal, but instead lets say he entered the player code incorrectly causing the "confirmed" transfer to fail...would said manager lose Karma for that? Would people use things like this as a loophole? He gets a week's grace to make amends. Mistakes and errors are acceptable but if the manager fails to put the deal through the turn after his 'input error' then it's clear that it was a ruse and the deal is not going to happen.
_________________ Dinamo Tbilisi 122
|
|
|
|
|
Math
|
Posted: Tue May 16, 2017 1:17 pm |
|
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2015 6:26 pm Posts: 2619
|
ronem wrote: Tilly wrote: Only one question really; Let's say a manager didn't pull out of a deal, but instead lets say he entered the player code incorrectly causing the "confirmed" transfer to fail...would said manager lose Karma for that? Would people use things like this as a loophole? He gets a week's grace to make amends. Mistakes and errors are acceptable but if the manager fails to put the deal through the turn after his 'input error' then it's clear that it was a ruse and the deal is not going to happen. Or they just check their return mds receipt and ensure its correct. After all that is what its for
_________________ Active Teams
Game 123 (EFG) - Bayern Munich Game 123 (EFG) - Notts County Game 124 (HFG) - Al Nassr
|
|
|
|
|
mick3649
|
Posted: Tue May 16, 2017 1:27 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2012 4:12 pm Posts: 2448 Location: Newcastle
|
Plus it also depends on the manager if he needs to report you.
_________________ Lazio 54 , West Ham 108 , Mainz 111 , Barcelona 112 HFG , Celta Vigo 115 , Watford 116 , Leicester City 117 HFG , Barcelona 118 , B Dortmund119 Legends , Newcastle Utd 120 , Spartak Moscow 121 HFG, FF Jaro
|
|
|
|
|
mick3649
|
Posted: Tue May 16, 2017 1:28 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2012 4:12 pm Posts: 2448 Location: Newcastle
|
What happens if they report you just for the sake of it do we have to show UE evidence or will UE look in to it first before taking Karma points off you?
_________________ Lazio 54 , West Ham 108 , Mainz 111 , Barcelona 112 HFG , Celta Vigo 115 , Watford 116 , Leicester City 117 HFG , Barcelona 118 , B Dortmund119 Legends , Newcastle Utd 120 , Spartak Moscow 121 HFG, FF Jaro
|
|
|
|
|
Admin
|
Posted: Tue May 16, 2017 2:22 pm |
|
|
Site Admin |
|
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2012 2:44 pm Posts: 921 Location: UE Towers
|
Fadi wrote: Hi Ben, All my thoughts on your post are in red below... Please do let me know your feedback. Admin wrote: Karma points will be similar to UE points, but gained by being active in the game and forum. Karma can be gained by: 1) Submitting an MDS (5 Karma) - Whilst i know people forget to submit their MDS why are we rewarding someone for doing something so vital in playing the game? - I think this should be 1 point! This is here to make sure it's easy for everyone to get a regular supply of Karma, so it's still a feature for those who aren't as active in the game and on the forum2) Completing an agreed deal with another manager (1 per player transferred) (Not by selling a player via the transfer list or two a rest of the World club) - No indication here of how many points you are offering so i would say 20, this is 100% a good one to keep on here and im sure gibbo will agree 1 Karma per player transferred. Don't want it to be too big a factor3) Using the ‘Charity Work’ action in the actions section (1 per action slot used) - This again is a good idea, however i would like to see morale interrogated with this also, especially players with "DIS" sa having it go down cause they hated it or up because the played a trick on the players whilst away from training - I would also like to see feedback from your assistant in detail of how it went and who enjoyed it and who didn't. - Again no points indicated so i would say 10. 1 Karma per action slot used. The rewards and costs are all relative but being able to get 10 per action or a guaranteed 100 per week would mean the more expensive options like adding Att/Mid/Def would happen too often4) Posted a message on the manager noticeboard (unique/relevant messages only) - Whilst this is a good way to get people on the forums, how is this going to be monitored? This meant entering a massage on your MDS which will go on the manager noticeboard on your report. Not for entering one post on the forum.
I can see the advantages in rewarding each post on the forum, but that is something that would take a lot of work to maintain. It might be possible have a secondary post count on each account that can start at 0 and be reset by the admin. Managers could then ‘cash out’ converting those posts into Karma. But I don’t know if this is possible with the current forum.
5) Whichever manager spends the most (or joint most) actions on 'Charity Work' gets an additional 25 Karma points. - I dont agree with this, so if you fill your actions section with charity every week and dont train no one or praise no one etc you get rewarded? Hmmm It's a possible strategy for that turn. You would forgo individual training, player interaction, using any UE points or Karma, moving players to different squads, etc6) The running and completing, or winning, of any player run competitions on the forum will game you Karma. The amount will depend on the competition, email the office if you wish to do this. - This i 100% agree with and i would offer 100 points for running a SUCCESSFUL competition and offered at the end of the competition. 7) You can use an Action slot to bet 10 Karma on the result of a league match. The odds will be (league position*2+ 8)/20. So betting on a first place team to win would win you 5 points. Betting on a 6th placed team would win you 10 points. Betting on a 14th placed team would win you 18 points. This can be done multiple teams per week and you can bet on yourself. Any team caught picking a weakened team for a meaningful match or betting on another manager doing so, will lose Karma. Ok this is where it gets complicated, #1 You shouldn't be able to bet on yourself, #2 the penalty for anyone going against the (fielding a weakened team etc) should be serve eg 200 lost karma (even if that puts you in minus). Something could be in place to stop you betting against yourself, but if you're confident you are going to win I don't see any harm in betting on yourself. The penalty needs reviewing, it's supposed to encourage managers to do deals on the forum rather than discourage them.Karma can be lost by: If a deal is arranged on a thread on the forum, and both managers write 'confirmed' on the thread, it is classed as 'agreed'. - Whilst this is a good idea, this can open a can of worms on the naming and shaming type thread that you do not agree or allow in UE. It would be done by email in private. No naming and shaming threads will be permitted on the forum.If one manager pulls out of the deal - the manager who has been let down can report it to the office by email, if they wish to. The manager who pulled out of the deal would lose 20 karma points. If a manager fails to write a deal down or does so wrongly they will have the opportunity to do the deal in the following turn. - What happens if its attention to detail, eg the ID had 1 wrong letter cause they typed "D" instead of "F" as they are next to each other on the keyboard? You won't lose Karma for mistakes, and will have the opportunity to correct them the following turnDeals arranged by pm or whatsapp are unaffected, unless they are confirmed on the forum. - This can be a way to avoid receiving a penalty, or if the said manager wanted to penalise the other manager for failing the deal a name and shame situation could arise from this... Karma can be spent on: 1) Reducing an injury by 1 week (20 Karma) (only be done once per team, per week, can't be done for 1 week injuries). - Good idea2) Regaining lost confidence (50 Karma) (can only be done one the week that a player’s confidence has gone down) - Good idea3) Persuade a player not to retire (100 Karma) (can only be done on players under 37) - Good idea, however i dont think it should always work, maybe set the percentage to 93.33% - Meaning that 9 times out of 10 it will work, however that 1 time it might or it might not work - Also maybe you should be told on week 20 that so and so is going to retire eos allowing you to decide early on using the karma points or not, otherwise you may use longevity and the player retires. I'm not keen on it being a 9 times out of 10 thing. 100 Karma should be a reasonably large amount that you have to save up for (maybe the cost needs to be higher?) and should do what it says on the tin.4) Give an older player longevity (200 Karma) (less likely to lose stats at the EOS) - Whats the age limit? As above No age limit5) Give a player the Def/Mid/Att special ability (500 Karma) - Good ideaWhen this is implemented, all Karma spend and UE Points spent, will be done in the actions section. mick3649 wrote: What happens if they report you just for the sake of it do we have to show UE evidence or will UE look in to it first before taking Karma points off you? Any report would need to link to the thread in question. A sub forum in transfers may need to be set up which can't be edited, which managers could confirm in, if they wish to. Padova 119 wrote: Like this, great idea. Rather than Karma Points, could you not just incorporate it into UE points? Just may be easier to keep it all under one banner? Just dumb down the amount of points you get, or redo the amount of UE points it costs to do things? I think it's best if they are seperate, both able to to different things and be obtained in different ways. themouth1888 wrote: Yeah this seems fine and rewards the people who put somthing into the forums on a day to day basis. For me the injuries are more and more common so anything to cut down on them is fine. Can I also check to see if we can use this to aid recovery once not injured? I.f if a player is out for 7 or 8 weeks its another 3 before he is even near fit to start playing again. Can we use Karma to skip these weeks? The adding a postion to a player could be mega! I have a defender in 117 whos rotting in reserves that's a 39CF Something could be done to make sure their fitness is say 90% when they return from injury if Karma is spent on reducing the injury.
_________________ The voice of Ultimate Europe...
|
|
|
|
|
Martin B
|
Posted: Wed May 17, 2017 1:17 am |
|
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 4:08 pm Posts: 1481 Location: South London
|
My biggest concern as other managers have stated is the increased time and pressure on Ben to run all these changes but if he's confident the computer will run everything then no reason why we shouldn't give it a go.
I am still concerned though about Ben possibly creating a rod for his own back, while the ideas all sound good the last thing we want is for Ben to be drawn into arguements over whether a deal was genuine or gamed just to earn Karma e.g are Team A and Team B going to keep swapping crap youth players between each other to top up the points. I like the tools but as ever it always comes down to how the tools of the game are used by the managers. Or other grey areas such as how do you define a weakened team?
If all can be smoothed out and run with the simplest of intervention then great, lets give it a go.
_________________ G123 - Toulouse G124 - Al-Ahli
|
|
|
|
|
Math
|
Posted: Thu May 18, 2017 9:25 pm |
|
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2015 6:26 pm Posts: 2619
|
Martin B wrote: My biggest concern as other managers have stated is the increased time and pressure on Ben to run all these changes but if he's confident the computer will run everything then no reason why we shouldn't give it a go.
I am still concerned though about Ben possibly creating a rod for his own back, while the ideas all sound good the last thing we want is for Ben to be drawn into arguements over whether a deal was genuine or gamed just to earn Karma e.g are Team A and Team B going to keep swapping crap youth players between each other to top up the points. I like the tools but as ever it always comes down to how the tools of the game are used by the managers. Or other grey areas such as how do you define a weakened team?
If all can be smoothed out and run with the simplest of intervention then great, lets give it a go. I'm sure Ben wouldn't have suggested it if he wasn't confident in coping with the extra work. As for friendlies then maybe an idea could be that karma wouldn't be awarded for these, then its irrelevant about fielding good or weakened sides. In competitive matches then it'll be plain for all to see if someone has fielded a weakened side I'm sure with the small amount of busybodies in UE Ben would be notified of someone doing this anyway. Looking forward to the karma thing being set up as I'm sure it will boost most members participation on the forums.
_________________ Active Teams
Game 123 (EFG) - Bayern Munich Game 123 (EFG) - Notts County Game 124 (HFG) - Al Nassr
|
|
|
|
|
|
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests |
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|
|