UltimateEuropeForums.net

Although it is called game of legends, any ex players can be added to the game. Earl Barrett, Igor Biscan and Paul Bracewell are a few examples of the players no everyone would consider legendary.

If there is any player you think should be in the game, whether they played for a team you are planning to manage or not, they can be added. Email the office rather than post a list on the forum as there may be other managers who are planning to scout or SPS that player. Just be aware, unless they were a one club man like Ryan Giggs, or someone who only played for one European team, like Steven Gerrard, they won’t necessarily be at the club you want.

Some players that were put in from the distant past, were done so based on a paragraph found on google. If there is a player you may be more familiar with that plays for a team you are going to manage, feel free to share your thoughts before the game is run, and they will be considered.

But to be clear, no players will be moved to other clubs or have their stats changed once the game has started.

The problem is getting people to spend higher means two things-

1) UE make more money up front which helps pay the bills (it is a business after all).

2) The more people that pay for 2+ season tickets up front the more they are committed to the game which aids longevity. This style of game is new and let's face it it may not work out but by getting more people paying for over a season now it will protect it being a flop after one season, which wouldn't be cost effective for all the work required to launch it.

Don't get me wrong, I'm not pro paying loads myself but I can see why that's a favoured option for them.

Another suggestion is no points in season 1. If UE are going to balance squads, no points could be a good thing

If lower teams don't get points then I can't see the point in playing TBH. Big clubs will not sell. Fact. It has been stated that they will be -25 max. Why would they sell. Lower teams with no points are just not attractive.

Big money to pay for a team = higher chance of success.

If lower teams don't get points then I can't see the point in playing TBH. Big clubs will not sell. Fact. It has been stated that they will be -25 max. Why would they sell. Lower teams with no points are just not attractive.

Big money to pay for a team = higher chance of success.

This has already been mentioned and I'd just like to touch on it again. I would love a chance to manage Man Utd, Barca, Madrid etc etc etc but I do not have the money to throw £400 at them. A raffle system might work. Minimum buy into this raffle could be 1 season ticket. A manageable sum for 99% of participants.

The same managers get the big teams and we should try and give others a chance.

I'd like to see a raffle of sorts for teams... a lot of us can't just throw hundreds of pounds to nail down the team we desperately want and the same lot go mental and take all the big sides.

Would be nice to see others get a chance even if that means in a fair automated draw that I get bognor Regis;)

At least it will make the game interesting with different managers at the helm of the big sides.

I think the raffle / name generator to allocate teams is a good idea and one I would be up for.

Minimum buy in of a season ticket would see more teams throughout all leagues managed as opposed to just all the big Name teams taken up.

Perhaps a poll could be run to see how everyone else feels.

The problem is getting people to spend higher means two things-

1) UE make more money up front which helps pay the bills (it is a business after all).

2) The more people that pay for 2+ season tickets up front the more they are committed to the game which aids longevity. This style of game is new and let's face it it may not work out but by getting more people paying for over a season now it will protect it being a flop after one season, which wouldn't be cost effective for all the work required to launch it.

Don't get me wrong, I'm not pro paying loads myself but I can see why that's a favoured option for them.

One concern I (and a few others) have had is how high all players will be from the start and such a pool of top players to cherry pick from ROTW. It could feel like season in 117 from day one.

Do you have a plan for that please Ben?

I'm maybe not 100% getting this so say I was to bid on Barcelona would I start off with current Barca squad and no legends or I could perhaps have someone like Stoichkov thrown in?

I'm taking this as the legends are put into smaller teams? Is this to make them more attractive to managers?

Thanks

Couple of thoughts

I'm not too sure how adding legends with high ratings and then low potential would work. Almost puts a downer upon them that they won't increase much.

maybe the legends shouldn't come in as massively rated but come with the guarantee that they will turn into a legend, like a Special kind of legend pot added to them. So they can increase gradually like normal players but they have pot added, the better legends will be still eventually become some of the best rated. Just an idea.

Also it might be an idea to limit the amount of legends added. Or ue points could be used to add one/create.

As Will said, the more people commit to playing for 2+ seasons the healthier the game will be in the long run. And this is a business, and there are bills to pay.

Part of the reason the game is set up the way it is, is that teams like PSV (who might have Ronaldo and Romario up front), Ajax (who will have Rijkaard and Van Basten), Milan (Maldini and Baresi), as well as many other legendary players, will be much closer to the Man Utds, Real Madrids and Liverpools of this world.

But if you want a chance of managing one of the traditional big teams I can offer you this:

Get ten or more managers together, each willing to put in for 1 season ticket each.

One of you will be guaranteed to manage one of the following:

Real Madrid
Barcelona
Man Utd
Man City
Chelsea
Liverpool
Arsenal
Tottenham
Juventus
Bayern Munich

The other 9 will be put in the same division as eachother.