UltimateEuropeForums.net

A very simple one here.
I'd like to see a change to a GK's PV stats.

Using a made up keeper :-

BANG G Banks 28 R 9 9 7 7 7 7 9 7 7 7 7 9 92 - 36 GK.

This would mean that the GKs PV stats replaced the stats for Sho, Mov, Hea and Vis rather than the current Agg, Tac, Jud and Vis. I just feel that Agg, Tac and Jud have bigger parts to play in the make-up of a modern GK than Sho, Mov and Hea.

_________________
Dinamo Tbilisi 122

Hi Bro (Ronem),

Tbh, its my own calculation however UE would be a java based game, with excel type breakdowns in terms of working out (In my opinion - I could be wrong) - They have never revealed this.
However alot of people know how to work max's out and as a result this is the only assumption i could come up with.

I do see you point, in regards to players only putting there own players in does make it alot more complicated.

In regards to your GK stats it is a good idea however i would choose different stats.

BANG G Banks 28 R 9 9 7 7 7 7 9 7 7 7 7 9 92 - 36 GK.
I feel these two stats highlights should be re-done - (Movement/Speed)
The main stats for me would be:
-Movement/Speed/Rushing Out
-Reflexes/Handling/Aerial Ability
-Distribution (Throwing/Kicking)
-Command of Area/Communication

What do you think on that?

_________________
Fadi Mazloum
Botafogo G124
NEW PODCAST WEBSITE COMING SOON
07787560603
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
-------------------
Real Madrid Game 43 - Champions League Winners - S2
Inter Milan Game 105 - Treble Winner S3
Santa Clara Game 108 - Doubles Winner S2

MOV is off the ball movement. GK is the position that always moves toward the ball so I consider it expendable. HEA is a gimme to remove as is SHO.
I would still keep the current four GK stats but just in different positions to replace those I considered less key.

_________________
Dinamo Tbilisi 122

With regard to your (Fadi) idea in confidence, I believe that players have different inherent levels of confidence. A blanket improvement under certain conditions would not sit with this.
I have had world class players who stubbornly refuse to move from 'OK' whilst others hover at excellent despite a lack of game time.
I see the international football feature as a fun add-on and would like it to be incidental rather than influential. All confidence issues are better left to team management.
As a related side issue, I recently loaned out a player who wasn't used at the borrowing club and returned to me with reduced stats and confidence. I would suggest that failure to reasonably maintain a loan player should result in a penalty on the borrower not the loaner.

_________________
Dinamo Tbilisi 122

Don't agree with the loan penalty if the player is being loaned it's because he's not good enough for first team why should the loaning team play a player if his ratings are crap some do loans as cover after selling
At the end of the day if you loan out a player it's your responsibility to recall him if he's not being used if you decide to leave him then that's down to you

_________________
HISTORY

GAMES PLAYED..........X 10
LEAGUE TITLES.........X 6
OTHER PROMOTIONS..X 12
DOMESTIC CUP WINS X 6
EURO/UEFA /SUPPER CUP WINS X 4

I loaned the player in answer to an appeal in the most wanted section. Do you not consider that courtesy extended should be repaid in kind?
If a manager borrows a player who becomes surplus to requirements then it's a simple matter to either terminate the loan or play the player in the reserves.
A player can drop if not selected for two consecutive weeks so it is not something that can be circumvented easily by the loaning manager.

_________________
Dinamo Tbilisi 122

i agree if you loan a player you should play him or return to parent club but at end of the day the loaning manager has full control of deal.

_________________
HISTORY

GAMES PLAYED..........X 10
LEAGUE TITLES.........X 6
OTHER PROMOTIONS..X 12
DOMESTIC CUP WINS X 6
EURO/UEFA /SUPPER CUP WINS X 4

You are right, I should be pre-emptive and recall the player before he is dropped.

_________________
Dinamo Tbilisi 122

no you should recall him the 1st time he misses a game if thats what you expect from your loan deals

_________________
HISTORY

GAMES PLAYED..........X 10
LEAGUE TITLES.........X 6
OTHER PROMOTIONS..X 12
DOMESTIC CUP WINS X 6
EURO/UEFA /SUPPER CUP WINS X 4

Can we have injurie lengths to include the player getting back to 100% fitness? I had someone our for 5 or 6 weeks then I had to wait another 2 weeks before he could even go on the bench! Can this not all be built in?

_________________
Current teams:


Game121: F Sittard
Game 122: Arsenal, Esbjerg, Hajduk Split

Yeah I would prefer this. Injuries is the thing people dislike the most but obviously is all part of the game. This would balance it out a bit more so at least you know when they are back ready.

_________________
Udinese 117 (S4 Ryan Wilson Cup Winners)
Piacenza 119

maybe worth exploring UE points to reduce injuries by x weeks or % as injuries can cost a team (and managers morale) if its long i.e. 3+weeks then recover time

On the other hand, a lot of managers don't build a squad and concentrate on 11 players only - i have 19 squad players and 5 subs players to cover any injury threat so if Ojamaa gets injured, Ojamaas brother steps up

ue points to reduce long term injuries would be welcomed though

_________________
S1 Swindon Town 117 - Prem
S1 - Finished 6th - Learning the hard way...
S2 - Div I Champions - What a season...
S3 - Survival - Finished 6th
S4 - Win the UEFA Cup