UltimateEuropeForums.net

As we all know, pot players are banned from transfers for 5 weeks. As a big club I feel this has made deals complicated and forced me to deal with only managers I trust.
What is the veiws of others? Do you agree with it or disagree.
Or do you not have an opinion either way.

_________________
Sampdoria 123
New York RB 124

I understand why it's been done, but the possibility of a small team in 120 getting a pretty decent player early in the game, doesn't now exist. That bigger player would help a small team much more in the short term than any player with POT would

_________________
Real Sociedad - 123
Wolves - 123
Stade Brestois - 123
Club Atletico Independiente - 124

Agree with the above, but the flip side of the arguement is it benefits small sides too as it gives time to bring in scout finds.

You could then have better players with added potential and score even better deals from the big sides.

_________________
Wolfsburg 108, Las Palmas 112, Arsenal 114 and Torino/Molde 119

In the easy format games the big sides will 95% always deal with the big sides. POT or no POT ban, this method was always going to happen and from whats being said about 120 apparently this is happening. The only issue is the big sides can now blame 'Pot ban' for not dealing with the lesser sides.

I hate to say it.......

_________________
Active Teams

Game 123 (EFG) - Bayern Munich
Game 123 (EFG) - Notts County
Game 124 (HFG) - Al Nassr

10 was too long 5 is too short.

I think 7 is perfect.

_________________
Fadi Mazloum
Botafogo G124
NEW PODCAST WEBSITE COMING SOON
07787560603
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
-------------------
Real Madrid Game 43 - Champions League Winners - S2
Inter Milan Game 105 - Treble Winner S3
Santa Clara Game 108 - Doubles Winner S2