| Author |
Message |
|
Admin
|
 Posted: Tue Jul 04, 2017 10:56 am |
|
 |
| Site Admin |
 |
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2012 2:44 pm
Posts: 921
Location: UE Towers
|
|
Now that Game 119 is halfway through it's first season, what are people's thoughts on how the 'can't transfer player for 10 weeks after giving a player potential' rule, has gone?
Should it have been longer or shorter?
Although they are some way off, would you like to see it used in the next normal game or Hard Format game?
_________________
The voice of Ultimate Europe...
|
|
  |
|
 |
|
Natty O
|
Posted: Tue Jul 04, 2017 2:39 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2012 12:17 pm
Posts: 2562
Location: Worcester
|
|
I think it worked well.
_________________
Marseille100(S2-9
M'pellier107(S1-4
Mallorca109(S1
M’pellier112(S1-5
ICT113(S1
Napoli114(S1
M’pellier115(S1-2
M’pellier116(S1-2
MGB117(S1-6
PSV118(S1-3
Leicester119(S1-79)
Cheltenham/Tenerife120(S1-7)
R Sociedad121(S1-7)
Palace122
Girona123
Nacional124
|
|
| |
|
|
|
mick3649
|
Posted: Tue Jul 04, 2017 2:45 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2012 4:12 pm
Posts: 2448
Location: Newcastle
|
|
Personally I would do 5 weeks max as 10 weeks is a long wait
_________________
Lazio 54 , West Ham 108 , Mainz 111 , Barcelona 112 HFG , Celta Vigo 115 , Watford 116 , Leicester City 117 HFG , Barcelona 118 , B Dortmund119 Legends , Newcastle Utd 120 , Spartak Moscow 121 HFG, FF Jaro
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Lee G
|
Posted: Tue Jul 04, 2017 3:01 pm |
|
|
|
I think its spot on. I put potential on a few players from Nork and it gave me a good amount of time to play them, train them and see how they perform before deciding if to keep or swap. Fumbs up here  Any longer would mean we could be stuck with players unable to deal.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Tom
|
Posted: Tue Jul 04, 2017 4:58 pm |
|
Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2015 5:15 pm
Posts: 42
|
|
I'm not that keen on it, would definitely not want it in HFG.
I'd rather the potential is reflected in the price of a player to make deals easier/more transparent to agree. If you add it to a player season 1 could be high (say +£30m) and if added each subsequent season it gets lower.
Might stop the 2 pot player demands that seem to be the issue and reason for this in the first place?
_________________
Udinese 117 (S4 Ryan Wilson Cup Winners)
Piacenza 119
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Math
|
Posted: Tue Jul 04, 2017 5:09 pm |
|
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2015 6:26 pm
Posts: 2621
|
Tom wrote: I'm not that keen on it, would definitely not want it in HFG.
I'd rather the potential is reflected in the price of a player to make deals easier/more transparent to agree. If you add it to a player season 1 could be high (say +£30m) and if added each subsequent season it gets lower.
Might stop the 2 pot player demands that seem to be the issue and reason for this in the first place? Been saying this all along, POT should increase a players value. After all, it has far more worth than any SA in my opinion.
_________________
Active Teams
Game 123 (EFG) - Bayern Munich
Game 123 (EFG) - Notts County
Game 124 (HFG) - Al Nassr
|
|
| |
|
|
|
iancathcart1984
|
Posted: Tue Jul 04, 2017 7:22 pm |
|
Joined: Tue Oct 01, 2013 9:57 pm
Posts: 507
|
|
10 weeks is abit too long, I would agree with 5 turns.
_________________
MAN CITY 113
League Winners x 1
Champions League Winners x 1
FA Cup Winners x 1
BAYERN MUNICH 115
League Winners x 2
Champions League Winners x 1
ROMA 117
Champions League Winners x 1
|
|
| |
|
|
|
LUKE
|
Posted: Tue Jul 04, 2017 8:50 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2012 3:11 pm
Posts: 2104
|
|
smaller clubs need pot players especially in a HFG to get names from bigger teams any delay would mean smaller clubs would struggle to do much till half way through the season by then any promotion push might well be beyond reach
_________________
HISTORY
GAMES PLAYED..........X 10
LEAGUE TITLES.........X 6
OTHER PROMOTIONS..X 12
DOMESTIC CUP WINS X 6
EURO/UEFA /SUPPER CUP WINS X 4
|
|
| |
|
|
|
BRESCIA 122
|
Posted: Tue Jul 04, 2017 8:56 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2012 7:42 pm
Posts: 743
|
|
Think 10 weeks is about right!
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Kenny Nield
|
Posted: Tue Jul 04, 2017 8:59 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2012 1:23 pm
Posts: 408
Location: Fleetwood
|
liverpool wrote: smaller clubs need pot players especially in a HFG to get names from bigger teams any delay would mean smaller clubs would struggle to do much till half way through the season by then any promotion push might well be beyond reach The big clubs would still need to sell to get out of debt most just ask for pot and cash and a lot jump at it to get the named player least now they will have to settle for non pot and cash or just cash.
_________________
Previously
Atl Madrid 103
Caen 108
Salamanca 109
Newcastle 110
Chelsea 113
rubin kazan 116
Aston Villa 117
Valladolid 119
Burnley 120
Zenit 121
Boavista 122
Currently
FC Seoul 124
07864096889 - Watts app or text me.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Pezzer
|
Posted: Tue Jul 04, 2017 9:12 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2012 7:36 pm
Posts: 514
Location: Kings Lynn, Norfolk
|
|
Agree 10 weeks is perfect - Gives managers time to see if they are worth keeping or should move on!
Definitely for hard format games - will give the big teams more of a headache!
_________________
Juventus 117
S1 - Serie A Runners Up / FA Cup Winners / CL Semi's
S2 - 5th in Serie A / Charity Shield Winners / CL 1/4's
S3 - 7th in Serie A / CL 1/4's
S4 - 8th in Serie A / Uefa Cup Semi's
Bilbao 119
S1 - FA Cup Winners
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Andy Davidson
|
Posted: Tue Jul 04, 2017 10:01 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2012 6:55 pm
Posts: 409
Location: Chester
|
|
I think it's about right.
In a HFG game though it may have to be slightly shorter as big teams who start in heavy debt need these players to reduce debt quickly. Unless the rules on clearing debt would be relaxed slightly??
_________________
Lyon 95
Chievo 107
Arbroath 117
Feyenoord 118
Everton 120
Trabzonspor & Alaves 121
Marko Janko is the King
KAGS
|
|
| |
|
|
|
mtkbudapest
|
Posted: Tue Jul 04, 2017 10:16 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2016 11:01 am
Posts: 97
|
|
Love it as you get to see what pot does to player before getting rid to quick
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Math
|
Posted: Tue Jul 04, 2017 10:18 pm |
|
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2015 6:26 pm
Posts: 2621
|
Kiev118 wrote: Love it as you get to see what pot does to player before getting rid to quick Like your women bud 
_________________
Active Teams
Game 123 (EFG) - Bayern Munich
Game 123 (EFG) - Notts County
Game 124 (HFG) - Al Nassr
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Dan_139
|
Posted: Tue Jul 04, 2017 10:18 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2012 1:08 pm
Posts: 667
|
|
10 weeks spot on for me. Anything that encourages longevity of a game and encourages player development over constant wheeling and dealing
_________________
Strasbourg & Breidablik Game 122
Atalanta Game 123
Penarol Game 124
|
|
| |
|
|
|
mtkbudapest
|
Posted: Tue Jul 04, 2017 10:19 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2016 11:01 am
Posts: 97
|
VFL Wolfsburg wrote: Kiev118 wrote: Love it as you get to see what pot does to player before getting rid to quick Like your women bud They are just dogs lol
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Athletic Bilbao 122
|
Posted: Wed Jul 05, 2017 10:30 am |
|
Joined: Fri Dec 16, 2016 11:58 am
Posts: 807
|
|
10 weeks was fine I think.
_________________
Athletic Bilbao 122
Deportivo Alaves 123
Alianza Atletico 124
Discord- Dillinja84#8741
WhatsApp 07484 131951
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Harryefc
|
Posted: Wed Jul 05, 2017 12:55 pm |
|
Joined: Fri Oct 23, 2015 4:18 pm
Posts: 363
|
|
Personally I think 5 weeks would be better, it still would stop big clubs requesting pot on players as I can't imagine anyone would wait that long for a deal.
I too personally wouldn't want it in hfg, or if it was then 5 weeks max.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
themouth1888
|
Posted: Wed Jul 05, 2017 1:04 pm |
|
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2016 10:42 pm
Posts: 671
|
|
In my opinion it should be reduced to 5 weeks.
I started off adding pot to a few of my players in my teams and I regret doing this to so many players as you really miss out on transfer activity.
After 5 weeks you can see how the player is progressing and you can evaluate your team. Smaller teams need to deal pot players.
On some of the newer teams I've taken I have swayed to SA instead of POT
_________________
Current teams:
Game121: F Sittard
Game 122: Arsenal, Esbjerg, Hajduk Split
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Fadi
|
Posted: Wed Jul 05, 2017 1:10 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 4:04 pm
Posts: 667
Location: London, UK
|
|
I think 10 weeks is best suited. I personally dont want to transfer my players that have pot, but if i have to then i can agree a deal in principle.
_________________
Fadi Mazloum
Botafogo G124
NEW PODCAST WEBSITE COMING SOON
07787560603
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
-------------------
Real Madrid Game 43 - Champions League Winners - S2
Inter Milan Game 105 - Treble Winner S3
Santa Clara Game 108 - Doubles Winner S2
|
|
| |
|
|
|
