| Author |
Message |
|
Math
|
 Posted: Tue Nov 01, 2016 11:43 pm |
|
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2015 6:26 pm
Posts: 2619
|
|
I have an idea that I would like to put forward to UE and would love fellow managers thoughts on this.
Given that it seems so many sides in games tend to live in the red or have low balances as regards to cash, so come turn 26 when managers are allowed to buy from unmanaged sides instead of cash only deals why can't we offer of a player swap as an alternative to cash only? Obviously with the UE computer deciding on what deals are acceptable anyway it seems like a pretty easy feature to set up and no unmanaged sides are being raped. Cash only gives unmanaged sides cash that they don't need, seem to use and those sides become depleted.
I would suggest the way to make the offer would be just to enter the deal as you would an agreed deal and then the computer decides to go with the best offer for the offloading club.
Adding this feature will allow all sides to make offers for players instead of those who have cash.
What's everyone's take on this?
_________________
Active Teams
Game 123 (EFG) - Bayern Munich
Game 123 (EFG) - Notts County
Game 124 (HFG) - Al Nassr
|
|
  |
|
 |
|
themouth1888
|
Posted: Wed Nov 02, 2016 12:28 am |
|
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2016 10:42 pm
Posts: 671
|
|
I think that's a fair idea, perhaps better than the cash buy. Teams don't get hammered and if they lose a top player they are compensated by at least as good coming back in
_________________
Current teams:
Game121: F Sittard
Game 122: Arsenal, Esbjerg, Hajduk Split
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Poweller
|
Posted: Wed Nov 02, 2016 12:33 am |
|
Joined: Tue Nov 10, 2015 4:46 pm
Posts: 22
|
|
I would stand corrected if I am wrong but can't unmanaged sides only sell 1 player at the end of the season anyway? If so, would they become depleted after the sale of 1 player?
_________________
118 - Torino
118 - Lokeren
119 - Bayer Leverkusen
119 - Slovan Bratislava
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Math
|
Posted: Wed Nov 02, 2016 12:49 am |
|
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2015 6:26 pm
Posts: 2619
|
Poweller wrote: I would stand corrected if I am wrong but can't unmanaged sides only sell 1 player at the end of the season anyway? If so, would they become depleted after the sale of 1 player? Not in first season, but after a few maybe. Anyway what's your thoughts on the actual idea?
_________________
Active Teams
Game 123 (EFG) - Bayern Munich
Game 123 (EFG) - Notts County
Game 124 (HFG) - Al Nassr
|
|
| |
|
|
|
O’Higgins FC
|
Posted: Fri Nov 04, 2016 7:29 am |
|
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 12:58 pm
Posts: 476
|
|
Or.....
Manage your money better and over the 26 weeks save some so you're able to make a eos bid
|
|
| |
|
|
|
muscles4851
|
Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2016 11:19 am |
|
Joined: Tue Mar 05, 2013 10:33 pm
Posts: 1534
|
|
This doesn't work for me. Who decides if it's a good deal for the club? Can't trust a computer for that. Keep it as it is. Woooooooo
_________________
Sampdoria 123
New York RB 124
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Admin
|
Posted: Thu Nov 10, 2016 12:21 pm |
|
 |
| Site Admin |
 |
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2012 2:44 pm
Posts: 921
Location: UE Towers
|
|
Offering players in exchange as part of the EOS bids isn't something we are going to consider.
_________________
The voice of Ultimate Europe...
|
|
| |
|
|
|
