| Author |
Message |
|
Admin
|
 Posted: Thu Jul 14, 2016 1:50 pm |
|
 |
| Site Admin |
 |
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2012 2:44 pm
Posts: 921
Location: UE Towers
|
|
At the moment, when you find a player through scouting or on the rest of the world transfer list the rules are the same as bidding for any other player. If your director’s confidence is below 60% you can bid up to his max value, if it is above 60% you can overbid by an undisclosed amount.
This has been a matter of discussion lately and an alternative has arisen.
If your Director’s confidence is above 70%, you can bid significantly more for a rest of the world player, whether he’s on the list or you find him through scouting.
The amount you can bid will not be unlimited, but it will be around twice the amount you can bid at the moment.
_________________
The voice of Ultimate Europe...
|
|
  |
|
 |
|
mick3649
|
Posted: Thu Jul 14, 2016 1:57 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2012 4:12 pm
Posts: 2448
Location: Newcastle
|
|
So for example if I had 55% DC and I bided say 80 to 90m for a player as I have loads of money. That mean then I can sign him if no one else has bided more then me?
_________________
Lazio 54 , West Ham 108 , Mainz 111 , Barcelona 112 HFG , Celta Vigo 115 , Watford 116 , Leicester City 117 HFG , Barcelona 118 , B Dortmund119 Legends , Newcastle Utd 120 , Spartak Moscow 121 HFG, FF Jaro
|
|
| |
|
|
|
daveyh
|
Posted: Thu Jul 14, 2016 2:03 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2012 11:12 am
Posts: 926
|
|
Mick, I think your DC will still have an impact and it won't be unlimited bidding.
Say if a max is £10m and you can bid in the present system up to £13,333,333 you would be able to pay £16,666,666 double the amount you can pay now.
_________________
Mainz 121
07747511888
|
|
| |
|
|
|
mick3649
|
Posted: Thu Jul 14, 2016 2:19 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2012 4:12 pm
Posts: 2448
Location: Newcastle
|
Cool thx got you matey 
_________________
Lazio 54 , West Ham 108 , Mainz 111 , Barcelona 112 HFG , Celta Vigo 115 , Watford 116 , Leicester City 117 HFG , Barcelona 118 , B Dortmund119 Legends , Newcastle Utd 120 , Spartak Moscow 121 HFG, FF Jaro
|
|
| |
|
|
|
daveyh
|
Posted: Thu Jul 14, 2016 2:38 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2012 11:12 am
Posts: 926
|
|
If I am reading it right it will still mean those that can work out values and amounts that can be paid will still be favourites to buy the players only that they will have to pay more to secure.
_________________
Mainz 121
07747511888
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Wolves 121
|
Posted: Thu Jul 14, 2016 2:46 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2012 8:17 pm
Posts: 2015
|
|
How are the shit teams like Watford with there low DC ever going to get a chance of getting one of these great players from the transfer list which we so desperately need to improve ??
We're not so everyone else will improve there team while we're stuck with division two players ! Lol
Think we should be able to bid what ever you like to be fair regardless of yr DC!
Bidding for players after I nearly work out there max values knowing that I'll be out bid is soul destroying I'm thinking of committing Suicide !
_________________
Napoli - Game 112 runners up twice lost by 1 point
Spurs 114 - League winners season 1
Watford 117 - shit times
Real Sociedad Game 118
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Admin
|
Posted: Thu Jul 14, 2016 3:11 pm |
|
|
| Site Admin |
|
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2012 2:44 pm
Posts: 921
Location: UE Towers
|
daveyh wrote: Mick, I think your DC will still have an impact and it won't be unlimited bidding.
Say if a max is £10m and you can bid in the present system up to £13,333,333 you would be able to pay £16,666,666 double the amount you can pay now. More like £26,666,666 daveyh wrote: If I am reading it right it will still mean those that can work out values and amounts that can be paid will still be favourites to buy the players only that they will have to pay more to secure. Yes, but the amounts will be so high I imagine they would rarely want to do it. Joe Watford 117 wrote: How are the shit teams like Watford with there low DC ever going to get a chance of getting one of these great players from the transfer list which we so desperately need to improve ??
We're not so everyone else will improve there team while we're stuck with division two players ! Lol
Think we should be able to bid what ever you like to be fair regardless of yr DC!
Bidding for players after I nearly work out there max values knowing that I'll be out bid is soul destroying I'm thinking of committing Suicide ! The minimum DC is so new managers can't come in and blow all their money on a average player before they really understand the nature of the game. But you have a point, maybe a minimum DC based on weeks at the club could be introduced.
_________________
The voice of Ultimate Europe...
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Steve Pesc
|
Posted: Thu Jul 14, 2016 4:44 pm |
|
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2012 12:51 pm
Posts: 287
|
Joe Watford 117 wrote: How are the shit teams like Watford with there low DC ever going to get a chance of getting one of these great players from the transfer list which we so desperately need to improve ??
We're not so everyone else will improve there team while we're stuck with division two players ! Lol
Think we should be able to bid what ever you like to be fair regardless of yr DC!
Bidding for players after I nearly work out there max values knowing that I'll be out bid is soul destroying I'm thinking of committing Suicide ! Win games? Win cups. I'm a shit team too and I have decent DC
_________________
[/color]110 - Leverkusen
111 - MGB
112 - Pescara
117 - Brescia
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Wolves 121
|
Posted: Thu Jul 14, 2016 5:23 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2012 8:17 pm
Posts: 2015
|
|
Im not playing to win games I'm playing to do swaps ha
_________________
Napoli - Game 112 runners up twice lost by 1 point
Spurs 114 - League winners season 1
Watford 117 - shit times
Real Sociedad Game 118
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Math
|
Posted: Thu Jul 14, 2016 5:27 pm |
|
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2015 6:26 pm
Posts: 2621
|
Joe Watford 117 wrote: How are the shit teams like Watford with there low DC ever going to get a chance of getting one of these great players from the transfer list which we so desperately need to improve ??
We're not so everyone else will improve there team while we're stuck with division two players ! Lol
Think we should be able to bid what ever you like to be fair regardless of yr DC!
Bidding for players after I nearly work out there max values knowing that I'll be out bid is soul destroying I'm thinking of committing Suicide ! Stop being so shit! 47% is unforgivable 
_________________
Active Teams
Game 123 (EFG) - Bayern Munich
Game 123 (EFG) - Notts County
Game 124 (HFG) - Al Nassr
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Math
|
Posted: Thu Jul 14, 2016 5:32 pm |
|
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2015 6:26 pm
Posts: 2621
|
|
I love the poll question, why can't it be really simple like 'Should we introduce an unlimited bidding for ROW players?'
As I don't get what the term 'relaxed' means. (Sorry for being dull)
That way far more people will concentrate on cash deals instead of swap, swap, swap all the time.
_________________
Active Teams
Game 123 (EFG) - Bayern Munich
Game 123 (EFG) - Notts County
Game 124 (HFG) - Al Nassr
|
|
| |
|
|
|
mick3649
|
Posted: Thu Jul 14, 2016 5:46 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2012 4:12 pm
Posts: 2448
Location: Newcastle
|
Wolfsburg 117 wrote: I love the poll question, why can't it be really simple like 'Should we introduce an unlimited bidding for ROW players?'
As I don't get what the term 'relaxed' means. (Sorry for being dull)
That way far more people will concentrate on cash deals instead of swap, swap, swap all the time. Agree with you 100% matey totally with you FG  Just make it simply UE 
_________________
Lazio 54 , West Ham 108 , Mainz 111 , Barcelona 112 HFG , Celta Vigo 115 , Watford 116 , Leicester City 117 HFG , Barcelona 118 , B Dortmund119 Legends , Newcastle Utd 120 , Spartak Moscow 121 HFG, FF Jaro
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Dinamo Tbilisi
|
Posted: Thu Jul 14, 2016 7:02 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 10:07 pm
Posts: 1527
Location: Hereford
|
In my ideal world, all players would go through the list and I could accumulate a fine side and dominate.(a bit like managing MGB in 87 and choosing the results yourself! ). I like the current system as it benefits those who do some homework but I do fully appreciate that others may wish for change. I would not like a convoluted system as described above. I have played for years. Some managers are new this week but they are as much part of UE as I am now. I would not want a two tier system which prevents new players from joining in fully. If a 36/95 player joins my side then the net benefit is small whereas imagine the centrepiece he'd make at Ascoli or Ternana or Alaves. I know that there's a risk that the new manager might not stick around once he has bought the player but there is surely more risk of him leaving because a rule says he can't compete? Unrestricted bidding works at EoS so it can work at all times .
_________________
Dinamo Tbilisi 122
|
|
| |
|
|
|
daveyh
|
Posted: Thu Jul 14, 2016 7:52 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2012 11:12 am
Posts: 926
|
mick3649 wrote: Wolfsburg 117 wrote: I love the poll question, why can't it be really simple like 'Should we introduce an unlimited bidding for ROW players?'
As I don't get what the term 'relaxed' means. (Sorry for being dull)
That way far more people will concentrate on cash deals instead of swap, swap, swap all the time. Agree with you 100% matey totally with you FG Just make it simply UE FG ahhhhhh so he is who everyone says he is 
_________________
Mainz 121
07747511888
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Yoda
|
Posted: Thu Jul 14, 2016 8:01 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2012 2:36 pm
Posts: 419
|
|
Although I have voted yes, I would also support the bid what you want scenario.
_________________
Borussia Dortmund - G122
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Steve Pesc
|
Posted: Thu Jul 14, 2016 8:39 pm |
|
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2012 12:51 pm
Posts: 287
|
|
Haha Micky gives the game away
_________________
[/color]110 - Leverkusen
111 - MGB
112 - Pescara
117 - Brescia
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Pezzer
|
Posted: Thu Jul 14, 2016 10:19 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2012 7:36 pm
Posts: 514
Location: Kings Lynn, Norfolk
|
|
No - Making it easier for the simpler folk is not the way forward!
_________________
Juventus 117
S1 - Serie A Runners Up / FA Cup Winners / CL Semi's
S2 - 5th in Serie A / Charity Shield Winners / CL 1/4's
S3 - 7th in Serie A / CL 1/4's
S4 - 8th in Serie A / Uefa Cup Semi's
Bilbao 119
S1 - FA Cup Winners
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Yoda
|
Posted: Thu Jul 14, 2016 10:34 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2012 2:36 pm
Posts: 419
|
Pezzer wrote: No - Making it easier for the simpler folk is not the way forward! I'm sure once upon a time you were no UE wizard. No need to insult peoples intelligence yet again.
_________________
Borussia Dortmund - G122
|
|
| |
|
|
|
mick3649
|
Posted: Thu Jul 14, 2016 10:56 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2012 4:12 pm
Posts: 2448
Location: Newcastle
|
daveyh wrote: mick3649 wrote: Wolfsburg 117 wrote: I love the poll question, why can't it be really simple like 'Should we introduce an unlimited bidding for ROW players?'
As I don't get what the term 'relaxed' means. (Sorry for being dull)
That way far more people will concentrate on cash deals instead of swap, swap, swap all the time. Agree with you 100% matey totally with you FG Just make it simply UE FG ahhhhhh so he is who everyone says he is Dave Dave Dave ...... I was only winding him up as he calls me That's specially M Letter so I wind him up Sorry Wolfsburg my man
_________________
Lazio 54 , West Ham 108 , Mainz 111 , Barcelona 112 HFG , Celta Vigo 115 , Watford 116 , Leicester City 117 HFG , Barcelona 118 , B Dortmund119 Legends , Newcastle Utd 120 , Spartak Moscow 121 HFG, FF Jaro
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Math
|
Posted: Thu Jul 14, 2016 10:57 pm |
|
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2015 6:26 pm
Posts: 2621
|
|
I'm lost here. What have I missed? What you sorry for?
_________________
Active Teams
Game 123 (EFG) - Bayern Munich
Game 123 (EFG) - Notts County
Game 124 (HFG) - Al Nassr
|
|
| |
|
|
|
