Author |
Message |
themouth1888
|
Posted: Fri Apr 24, 2020 11:16 pm |
|
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2016 10:42 pm Posts: 671
|
Ok so a few of us in the WhatsApp group have been chatting about this.
There are still a couple of very busy leagues but outside of that there are alot of top legend's being left to almost rot away.
A good few have agreed that being able to buy two players at EOS or even a second window to be opened up in say week 13 or something.
Ben has agreed to look at this but obviously doesn't want to waste his time. So setting this up so people can show their interest in this idea.
Cheers
_________________ Current teams:
Game121: F Sittard Game 122: Arsenal, Esbjerg, Hajduk Split
|
|
|
|
|
bingoant
|
Posted: Fri Apr 24, 2020 11:19 pm |
|
Joined: Wed Nov 26, 2014 8:27 pm Posts: 588
|
Definitely a good idea if it can be implemented. Totally in favour
_________________ Wigan 95 CL Winner Man City 109 FA Cup S5 Dresden 114 Blackburn & Espanyol 115 Bochum (League Cup) & Bradford 117 WIGAN ATH 118 WBA , Bochum 120 Hearts, Feyenoord, Man U 119 Burnley 121 Aberdeen 122
|
|
|
|
|
Johnwilesbrescia119
|
Posted: Fri Apr 24, 2020 11:25 pm |
|
Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2017 10:47 pm Posts: 2
|
I also think this is a good idea . Would keep alot of people interested in this game .
|
|
|
|
|
Natty O
|
Posted: Fri Apr 24, 2020 11:29 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2012 12:17 pm Posts: 2556 Location: Worcester
|
I think it’s a good idea but I feel the mid-season one should have a caveat, not sure what ?
Same league ? 21yo or under ? Certain max value ?? Only a certain % over max - maybe correlated to DC ??
Would just get people thinking a bit more ? But maybe hard to implement for Ben ?
For me, I just like the idea of something different and not leading a horse to water
_________________ Marseille100(S2-9 M'pellier107(S1-4 Mallorca109(S1 M’pellier112(S1-5 ICT113(S1 Napoli114(S1 M’pellier115(S1-2 M’pellier116(S1-2 MGB117(S1-6 PSV118(S1-3 Leicester119(S1-79) Cheltenham/Tenerife120(S1-7) R Sociedad121(S1-7) Palace122 Girona123 Nacional124
|
|
|
|
|
chiefsboy
|
Posted: Sat Apr 25, 2020 2:27 am |
|
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2017 3:10 pm Posts: 4 Location: Ashford, Kent
|
Sounds like a great idea to me.
|
|
|
|
|
Shoneywidds
|
Posted: Sat Apr 25, 2020 9:05 am |
|
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2016 7:34 pm Posts: 15
|
Yep!! I’m 100% on this, annoys the hell out of me that there are legends just wasting away at unmanaged teams and would also give an actual reason to get hold of cash mid season, another thing it may get other managers involved as loads of these unmanaged teams have cash so it wouldn’t be long until they would be able to buy a legend player they’ve always wanted or use that player in a swap to bring that team back to life again!
|
|
|
|
|
themouth1888
|
Posted: Sat Apr 25, 2020 12:27 pm |
|
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2016 10:42 pm Posts: 671
|
Natty O wrote: I think it’s a good idea but I feel the mid-season one should have a caveat, not sure what ?
Same league ? 21yo or under ? Certain max value ?? Only a certain % over max - maybe correlated to DC ??
Would just get people thinking a bit more ? But maybe hard to implement for Ben ?
For me, I just like the idea of something different and not leading a horse to water Could look at something like this if it makes ben a little easier about setting it up. I would be against the DC tho as that would exclude new managers getting involved with the bidding.
_________________ Current teams:
Game121: F Sittard Game 122: Arsenal, Esbjerg, Hajduk Split
|
|
|
|
|
Lazio121
|
Posted: Sat Apr 25, 2020 12:52 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 12:05 pm Posts: 687 Location: knighton,powys
|
I think this is a great idea, i think it should be standard for any game that goes past season 5/6 as it would keep the interest in the game, personally would prefer if new players can not have dc but have a minimum amount of weeks game time as nothing frustrates me more then certain teams getting taken over the week of the eos buys and then mysteriously being unmanaged 4/5 weeks later! But a definite plus for the game and if it implements as standard across all games after a certain amount of seasons its worth the time and effort to implement it
_________________ Ath Madrid 122
|
|
|
|
|
Math
|
Posted: Mon Apr 27, 2020 1:08 am |
|
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2015 6:26 pm Posts: 2619
|
Yep keen for this idea, good suggestion.
_________________ Active Teams
Game 123 (EFG) - Bayern Munich Game 123 (EFG) - Notts County Game 124 (HFG) - Al Nassr
|
|
|
|
|
Admin
|
Posted: Mon Apr 27, 2020 10:58 am |
|
|
Site Admin |
|
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2012 2:44 pm Posts: 921 Location: UE Towers
|
Have moved this to the general forum as it is something that could potentially effect all games. Happy to hear more thoughts about it.
_________________ The voice of Ultimate Europe...
|
|
|
|
|
arronpointon
|
Posted: Mon Apr 27, 2020 11:02 am |
|
Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2013 10:38 pm Posts: 561
|
I would be happy for this to be rolled out across all games.
I wouldn't be against this being introduced as early as season 1 - I'm all for some added excitement mid-season when things typically start to settle down.
I don't think there should be a maximum cap on the amount a manager can bid.
_________________ Atletico Madrid/Juventus 86 Ajax 99 St Mirren 107 Arsenal 112 Genoa 121
|
|
|
|
|
Yoda
|
Posted: Mon Apr 27, 2020 11:17 am |
|
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2012 2:36 pm Posts: 419
|
themouth1888 wrote: Ok so a few of us in the WhatsApp group have been chatting about this.
There are still a couple of very busy leagues but outside of that there are alot of top legend's being left to almost rot away.
A good few have agreed that being able to buy two players at EOS or even a second window to be opened up in say week 13 or something.
Ben has agreed to look at this but obviously doesn't want to waste his time. So setting this up so people can show their interest in this idea.
Cheers Well thought of mate This is a great idea as a game becomes less active in future seasons. It's a yes from me
_________________ Borussia Dortmund - G122
|
|
|
|
|
fyffee
|
Posted: Mon Apr 27, 2020 11:21 am |
|
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2016 9:28 pm Posts: 2124 Location: Dundee - City of Discovery
|
i think this a great idea, however instead of buying the player for cash when the new manager comes along. I think we should be able to do a swap deal regarding the said player so for instance if the player was £60mil instead of getting 80/90mil you can do a swap but the best swap deal for that team should get the player. Meaning that the team in question still is getting a player or players and could potentially strengthen there team for someone else to take them over.
_________________ Dundee United - Game 122 (Retired) Champions League Winner season 3 League Champion, Fa Cup and Charity Shield Winner season 4
Ajax - 123 Olympiakos - 123
Rosario Central - 124
|
|
|
|
|
Wezza
|
Posted: Sat May 02, 2020 1:45 pm |
|
Joined: Sun Aug 16, 2015 8:21 pm Posts: 93
|
I like the idea but don't think it should be implemented until later seasons in the game when the leagues in question have totally died off. Maybe could buy 2 players from unmanaged teams with less than 3 managers or so in that league? Don't want to be stripping sides that another manager could potentially want to take over in a busy league & be making teams weaker. Game 120 still really busy in season 4 & managers still taking over sides in England. Maybe look at season 5-6 onwards
_________________ Bayern Munich 116
Arsenal 117
Last edited by Wezza on Sat May 02, 2020 4:04 pm, edited 4 times in total.
|
|
|
|
|
themouth1888
|
Posted: Sat May 02, 2020 2:02 pm |
|
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2016 10:42 pm Posts: 671
|
Just so everyone aware game 119 approaching season 7 in a few turns so something for later on in games
_________________ Current teams:
Game121: F Sittard Game 122: Arsenal, Esbjerg, Hajduk Split
|
|
|
|
|
muscles4851
|
Posted: Sat May 02, 2020 4:08 pm |
|
Joined: Tue Mar 05, 2013 10:33 pm Posts: 1534
|
Sorry but this is a big no from myself.
Being able to buy to players Eos would destroy other leagues, even if there is just one manager in it then that's not acceptable for me.
This also has huge ramifications for active leagues as consider the amount of players being brought into the league.
I really don't like this idea and I urge people to approach with caution, think of the consequences long term.
_________________ Sampdoria 123 New York RB 124
|
|
|
|
|
Neily
|
Posted: Sat May 02, 2020 4:35 pm |
|
Joined: Tue Apr 28, 2020 7:13 pm Posts: 1161
|
Big no from me
I don’t see the point In it......if managers are in a empty league then move league if that’s such a issue
Totally against it......played in game since game 92 and never heard of this being an issue
_________________ Bolton - game 92 Aberdeen - game 98 Bolton/Aberdeen - game 99 Stirling - game 107 Aberdeen - game 110 Dresden - game 112 Udinese - game 121 Vorskla Poltava - game 121 Aberdeen - Game 123 Nublense FC - Game 124
|
|
|
|
|
Fadi
|
Posted: Sat May 02, 2020 5:06 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 4:04 pm Posts: 667 Location: London, UK
|
EOS yes, mid season no.
And even EOS is 1 player per team and that particular team can only lose 1 player.
_________________ Fadi Mazloum Botafogo G124 NEW PODCAST WEBSITE COMING SOON 07787560603 ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ ------------------- Real Madrid Game 43 - Champions League Winners - S2 Inter Milan Game 105 - Treble Winner S3 Santa Clara Game 108 - Doubles Winner S2
|
|
|
|
|
|