Could karma points be potentially traded for ue points?

Also could karma points buy DC? Say X amount for 5%. It would give those who can't work out max values a little bit of a chance if they could bid over max. And also I legends games (provided there is another) it would remove the lottery element for some, having the advantage of bidding over a players max. The only downside to game 119 ( for me personally) is the legends that are listed for max. 10 people all bid max then it's pot luck if you get him or not. Just an idea tho.

No, want to them to be seperate things.




An interesting idea, happy to hear other thoughts. Everyone would start with 0 Karma so wouldn't be able to improve their DC early enough for the start of season bids, even if this was implemented.

Karma will be per team rather than per manager.

Creating a player is interesting. Having 75 points to allocate would be tricky and time consuming to do. I really want options that the computer can handle by what is entered on the MDS. Ordering a trialist of a certain position is possible. Could be decent (stat's depending on the season), have good untrainables. Personalising the surname in this format is possible.

I like the idea generally but wouldn't want it over done re changing SA's etc.... we are trying to recreate the concept of managing a football club here not playing dungeons and dragons where magic potions can turn a snake into a lion (thats a guess, as I have never played dungeons and dragons but you get my point).

Hi Ben,

Would it be possible to use Karma points to swap a players SA? For example if a player came with Fla but his position more suited Res, Com etc then we could use Karma points to change this?

Thanks

Could karma points be potentially traded for ue points?

Also could karma points buy DC? Say X amount for 5%. It would give those who can't work out max values a little bit of a chance if they could bid over max. And also I legends games (provided there is another) it would remove the lottery element for some, having the advantage of bidding over a players max. The only downside to game 119 ( for me personally) is the legends that are listed for max. 10 people all bid max then it's pot luck if you get him or not. Just an idea tho.

This is where the game has gone nuts. Previously, it was possible to work out to the pound, a player's max which enabled those who could, to get a star or two in early.
Several lads bleated so it got changed so that every player had an individual value that made it tough to do more than make a reasoned estimate of a player's max. This still didn't guarantee everyone an equal share so we have turned it into a safe, soft-play area where we get told the max values and wait until our expertise is rewarded by a lucky dip.
So I'm a bit puzzled that we should try our best to stifle anybody being competitive through their own effort or intellect BUT we should allow managers to give themselves an advantage because they post more drivel than anyone else. Ridiculous!

I fully accept that many don't like any other managers having the ability to grab an advantage so I wish to state that I find it unfair that any sales or swaps are done without me being given first option. If UE could attend to this immediately then I would be grateful. (Equally ridiculous!)

Really like the idea of creating a youth player very interesting!

Mark, I agree in principle with most of what you say but I have to point out that the whole argument of the system for working max values is nonsensical in all fairness...
One simply had to find a player of the same age, oa and pv and it was there for anyone to take advantage of.

Yes, a lot of people didn't catch on or wasn't aware of this, but many were and in later games such as 110 onwards, most new the values and the 'skill' factor was lost... UE adding a new variable to randomize this was a master stroke in my opinion.

There was a lot of frustration from new managers though or relatively new ones that in every game certain managers would almost always get the best rotw players and making the game unfair or boring, I could kind of understand their greviences.

I'm not a fan of the new way of putting players who's value is over 50m to be up for their exact max value, just put them up for 50m and let a bidding war take place, it'll add much more fun and interest.


Back on point regarding Karma, as a major contributor to the forum in regards to number of posts, I truly hope UE does NOT award points for every post!
A far better idea is selected posts earn points and running and participation of side games on the forum.

Love the rest of the idea especially reducing the duration of an injury with karm! 2 week reduction for a 3 times the amount of karma is certainly one I would champion.