Mr Rone I like you matey but from 10 to 2 spaces for deal ??????
Nooooooooooooo my man please
| UltimateEuropeForums.net http://ultimate-europe.net/forum/ | |
| Proposed Game Change – Legend Regeneration http://ultimate-europe.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=284&t=48880 |
Page 1 of 3 |
| Author: | Admin [ Mon May 15, 2017 2:02 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Proposed Game Change – Legend Regeneration |
Only for non legend games. At the start of a new season 100-200 legend profiles (randomly selected from a list of entirely personalised legends - there are currently around 1,500), will be used to create new players that can be found at rest of the world teams. Their age, nationality and name will be randomised. There will be an OA limit for each season (some players wouldn't be eligible for season 2 for example), and there may be a, say, a 30% chance the player's nationality is the same as his legend profile. If this seems popular it will be added before the new season in 117. |
|
| Author: | Admin [ Mon May 15, 2017 2:06 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Proposed Game Change – Legend Regeneration |
Any thoughts are welcome. |
|
| Author: | muscles4851 [ Mon May 15, 2017 2:45 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Proposed Game Change – Legend Regeneration |
Game 107 or game 117? |
|
| Author: | Admin [ Mon May 15, 2017 2:46 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Proposed Game Change – Legend Regeneration |
117 |
|
| Author: | skeen [ Mon May 15, 2017 2:49 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Proposed Game Change – Legend Regeneration |
I don't personally like the random names ending up being the best players in the game. Like all the African scouts become super heroes etc. This feels like it would just add to that. I get that your trying to prolong the game but it would also feel a bit gutting to build up a team and then see a load of 100 OAs arrive like it did middle of season two in 117. |
|
| Author: | muscles4851 [ Mon May 15, 2017 2:53 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Proposed Game Change – Legend Regeneration |
On the other hand of that though, the addition of legends would encourage people to stay in the game and give those a chance that have not built the side they want. That would keep them in the game. So I say why not, give it a go then assess how it goes. If it doesn't quite work then no worries don't do it again |
|
| Author: | skeen [ Mon May 15, 2017 2:55 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Proposed Game Change – Legend Regeneration |
Yeah I think if they were the actual legends that would work - I'd far rather that than some random dude with the legends stats. |
|
| Author: | Math [ Mon May 15, 2017 2:58 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Proposed Game Change – Legend Regeneration |
Skeen wrote: I don't personally like the random names ending up being the best players in the game. Like all the African scouts become super heroes etc. This feels like it would just add to that. I get that your trying to prolong the game but it would also feel a bit gutting to build up a team and then see a load of 100 OAs arrive like it did middle of season two in 117. Im the opposite, i prefer the unknown being the better players as it means more work in to finding them instead of going to 'Botafogo' for Romario's son or whoever. Lets be honest most people go to Brazil and Argentina to scout first few turns, so to have this spread out all over other sides would make it far more challenging and mean more work has to be put in each season to find them top players. We frequently read moaning of rubbish scouts being found, well this would combat that issue for so many managers. Its a yes from me! |
|
| Author: | DarthFritzl [ Mon May 15, 2017 3:46 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Proposed Game Change – Legend Regeneration |
Any ideas that potentially improve the longevity of a game i personally would back 100%. |
|
| Author: | Tom [ Mon May 15, 2017 4:36 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Proposed Game Change – Legend Regeneration |
Makes sense as row players don't seem to improve stats so becomes a bit worthless by season 3. I'd prefer random names and not the top legends. Would they have the over 50m listed at max rule as well? that would be best imo. |
|
| Author: | mick3649 [ Mon May 15, 2017 4:39 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Proposed Game Change – Legend Regeneration |
Tom wrote: Makes sense as row players don't seem to improve stats so becomes a bit worthless by season 3. I'd prefer random names and not the top legends. Would they have the over 50m listed at max rule as well? that would be best imo. So there's gonna be legends players in 117 too???? |
|
| Author: | mick3649 [ Mon May 15, 2017 4:43 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Proposed Game Change – Legend Regeneration |
And if there maxes are gonna be around 50m plus then no point lol Rather get them on cheap so have cash for the EOS |
|
| Author: | skeen [ Mon May 15, 2017 4:46 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Proposed Game Change – Legend Regeneration |
VFL Wolfsburg wrote: Skeen wrote: I don't personally like the random names ending up being the best players in the game. Like all the African scouts become super heroes etc. This feels like it would just add to that. I get that your trying to prolong the game but it would also feel a bit gutting to build up a team and then see a load of 100 OAs arrive like it did middle of season two in 117. Im the opposite, i prefer the unknown being the better players as it means more work in to finding them instead of going to 'Botafogo' for Romario's son or whoever. Lets be honest most people go to Brazil and Argentina to scout first few turns, so to have this spread out all over other sides would make it far more challenging and mean more work has to be put in each season to find them top players. We frequently read moaning of rubbish scouts being found, well this would combat that issue for so many managers. Its a yes from me! This isn't the first few turns though it's season 3 supposedly. The best top players I'm saying should already be at clubs and in the game. The scouting shouldn't become too over-powering. I personally prefer to have a team of players I've heard off but each to their own. |
|
| Author: | mick3649 [ Mon May 15, 2017 4:50 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Proposed Game Change – Legend Regeneration |
Rather have players I know also |
|
| Author: | Bochum [ Mon May 15, 2017 4:57 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Proposed Game Change – Legend Regeneration |
Not sure I like the idea of this, think it will make it even harder for a small team to compete, especially if they are listed at 50 mil |
|
| Author: | Parkesy [ Mon May 15, 2017 5:12 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Proposed Game Change – Legend Regeneration |
I feel also its a bad idea sorry but it will kill small teams off and won't make people stay longer they will just get fed up with no players to go for and deals between team will be less too |
|
| Author: | Dinamo Tbilisi [ Mon May 15, 2017 5:42 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Proposed Game Change – Legend Regeneration |
I'm not a fan of changing the structure midway through a game. I'm not opposed to this being used in the future but not in an existing game. The Legends game stands on it's own and would be demeaned by the addition of those players to each and every game. Equally, the adoption of the advertised max values of top players in every game would be the end for me. Being told what to bid and waiting for a lucky draw does not constitute skill in my eyes. The only way that I would not object is if we reduced the number of deal spaces from 10 to 2 so that managers who love to deal have the game diminished for them too. |
|
| Author: | mick3649 [ Mon May 15, 2017 5:52 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Proposed Game Change – Legend Regeneration |
Mr Rone I like you matey but from 10 to 2 spaces for deal ?????? Nooooooooooooo my man please
|
|
| Author: | Dinamo Tbilisi [ Mon May 15, 2017 6:00 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Proposed Game Change – Legend Regeneration |
You like the deals; I love the maths. So only fair that we both suffer. |
|
| Author: | mick3649 [ Mon May 15, 2017 6:16 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Proposed Game Change – Legend Regeneration |
ronem wrote: You like the deals; I love the maths. So only fair that we both suffer. Valid Point 
|
|
| Page 1 of 3 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ | |